http://familypolicy.net Informing Christians and confronting the culture on the important moral issues of the day Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:27:54 +0000 en hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 Informing Christians and confronting the culture on the important moral issues of the day Family Policy Network, Inc. no Family Policy Network, Inc. itunes@familypolicy.net itunes@familypolicy.net (Family Policy Network, Inc.) 2011, Family Policy Network, Inc. All rights reserved. Informing Christians and confronting the culture on the important moral issues of the day Christian, family, Bible, conservative, prolife, values http://familypolicy.net/wp-content/plugins/powerpress/rss_default.jpg http://familypolicy.net/category/us TV-MA Forest, VA Each Weekday http://familypolicy.net/us/?p=10769 http://familypolicy.net/us/?p=10769#comments Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:11:53 +0000 Alex Mason http://familypolicy.net/?p=10769 http://familypolicy.net/us/?p=10769/feed 0 http://familypolicy.net/us/?p=10746 http://familypolicy.net/us/?p=10746#comments Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:33:52 +0000 Alex Mason http://familypolicy.net/?p=10746 Sunday, January 22nd was the 39th anniversary of the infamous Roe vs. Wade decision. As other presidents have done, President Obama issued a statement on the anniversary expressing his opinion on abortion. While other presidents (e.g., Clinton) have expressed support for abortion while paying lip service to making them “safe, legal, and rare,” President Obama took a unapologetically pro-abortion approach in his statement.]]> http://familypolicy.net/us/?p=10746/feed 0 http://familypolicy.net/us/?p=10730 http://familypolicy.net/us/?p=10730#comments Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:40:47 +0000 Alex Mason http://familypolicy.net/?p=10730 http://familypolicy.net/us/?p=10730/feed 0 http://familypolicy.net/us/?p=10694 http://familypolicy.net/us/?p=10694#comments Tue, 17 Jan 2012 19:42:06 +0000 Alex Mason http://familypolicy.net/?p=10694 The Obama administration seems bent on destroying the unborn in the name of “science.” President Obama’s National Institutes of Health (NIH) director has just approved four more human embryonic stem cell lines as eligible for federal research funding. Not only is research on embryonic stem cells (i.e., their destruction) morally wrong, but it is LESS effective than using other types of stem cells.]]> http://familypolicy.net/us/?p=10694/feed 0 http://familypolicy.net/us/?p=10679 http://familypolicy.net/us/?p=10679#comments Mon, 16 Jan 2012 04:01:00 +0000 bob http://familypolicy.net/?p=10679 http://familypolicy.net/us/?p=10679/feed 0 http://familypolicy.net/us/?p=10671 http://familypolicy.net/us/?p=10671#comments Fri, 13 Jan 2012 20:38:21 +0000 Alex Mason http://familypolicy.net/?p=10671 Many infertile women turn to in vitro fertilizaton to help them conceive children. In vitro fertilization, or IVF, is the process of fertilizing an egg outside the womb. Once fertilized, the newly-conceived human embryo is placed in a woman’s uterus in the hopes that a successful implantation will occur. But the chance of success implantation is not increased by implanting numerous embryo in a woman’s womb. New scientific research shows that success rates are basically identical between women who only have two embryos implanted and women who have three or more implanted. Doctors are now urging women to only have one or two embryos implanted. However, such advice still misses the point. ]]> http://familypolicy.net/us/?p=10671/feed 0 http://familypolicy.net/us/?p=10657 http://familypolicy.net/us/?p=10657#comments Wed, 11 Jan 2012 19:47:24 +0000 Alex Mason http://familypolicy.net/?p=10657 http://familypolicy.net/us/?p=10657/feed 0 http://familypolicy.net/us/?p=10653 http://familypolicy.net/us/?p=10653#comments Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:47:08 +0000 Alex Mason http://familypolicy.net/?p=10653 http://familypolicy.net/us/?p=10653/feed 0 http://familypolicy.net/us/?p=10629 http://familypolicy.net/us/?p=10629#comments Thu, 05 Jan 2012 17:47:19 +0000 Alex Mason http://familypolicy.net/?p=10629 Planned Parenthood has had a corrupt and murderous history ever since its founding by infamous racist and eugenicist Margaret Sanger. Despite its mercenary business model of “legally” murdering humans for a price, American taxpayers (including pro-lifers) have been forced to contribute hundreds of millions of dollars to the vile and bloodthirsty organization.]]> http://familypolicy.net/us/?p=10629/feed 0 http://familypolicy.net/us/?p=10623 http://familypolicy.net/us/?p=10623#comments Wed, 04 Jan 2012 16:41:06 +0000 Alex Mason http://familypolicy.net/?p=10623 As the country's youth continue to leave the Christian Church at a rapid rate, researchers attempt to pin down the reason for the mass exodus, pointing primarily to the relationship between organized religion and conservative politics, the postmodernist movement, and the psychosocial relationship between the youth and the elderly. A 2007 survey conducted by LifeWay Research found that 70 percent of 23- to 30-year-olds admitted to breaking regular church attendance for at least a year from ages 18 to 22. Fifty-two percent of these drop-outs attributed their departure to "religious, ethical, or political beliefs."]]> http://familypolicy.net/us/?p=10623/feed 0