Since 1998, voters in 20 states have passed state constitutional amendments defining marriage as the exclusive union between one man and one woman. On June 7, 2006, U.S. Senators from 8 of those 20 states failed to support the federal Marriage Protection Amendment (MPA). Voters in Hawaii, Louisiana, Michigan, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, North Dakota and Oregon may wonder why.

  • In ARKANSAS, with 75% of the electorate having approved a state marriage amendment, Senators Lincoln and Pryor voted against MPA.
  • In HAWAII, where 69% of voters passed a state constitutional amendment, Senators Akaka and Inouye both voted against MPA.
  • In LOUISIANA, where 78% of voters amended Louisiana’s Constitution to protect marriage, Senator Landrieu voted against MPA.
  • In MICHIGAN, where 59% of voters passed an amendment for traditional marriage, Senators Levin and Stabenow voted against MPA.
  • In MONTANA, where 66% of the voters approved the traditional definition of marriage as a state constitutional amendment, Senator Baucus voted against MPA.
  • In NEBRASKA, after 70% of his constituents passed an amendment protecting marriage, Senator Hagel did not show up for the vote on MPA. Instead, he visited Omaha to attend a speech on immigration by President Bush that day.
  • In NEVADA, where 67% of voters approved amending the state constitution to define one-man, one-woman marriage, Senator Reid voted against MPA.
  • In NORTH DAKOTA, where 73% of voters passed a marriage amendment, Senators Conrad and Dorgan voted against MPA.
  • In OREGON, where 58% of the electorate approved a state constitutional amendment for traditional marriage, Senator Wyden voted against MPA.
  • Comments are closed.