Michigan House passes dangerous pro-homosexual ‘hate crimes’ bill…

On November 18, 2008, in Michigan, by Family Policy Network

LANSING, MI — A dangerous, pro-homosexual ‘hate crimes’ proposal called “House Bill 6341″ (HB6341) has passed the Michigan House of Representatives, and it may soon pass the Michigan Senate unless you get involved. The bill’s supporters claim the proposal would only impact the perpetrators of violent crimes against people on the basis of their so-called “sexual orientation,” but innocent Christians have been maligned and even jailed in other states and countries under very similar laws.

PLEASE SPEAK UP NOW TO HELP DEFEAT THIS DANGEROUS THREAT TO RELIGIOUS LIBERTY.

Michigan Group Joins Boycott vs. Hallmark Over “same-sex couple” Cards

On October 7, 2008, in Michigan, by Family Policy Network

A Michigan pro-family group has joined a nationwide boycott of a major greeting card company as a result of its promotion of the homosexual lifestyle. The American Family Association of Michigan has joined forces with several other pro-family groups around the country to boycott Hallmark over the company’s new line of “same-sex couple” cards. AFA-Michigan’s [...]

FPN Flies Hope Over “Gay Pride” Events from California to Florida in 2007

On November 14, 2007, in California, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Michigan, Nation, National, Ohio, by Family Policy Network

Family Policy Network (FPN) spearheaded a campaign called “Project Hope Days,” wherein it flew airplane banners over pro-homosexual events throughout the nation that read, “JESUS CHRIST: WWW. HOPE FOR HOMOSEXUALS .COM.” The banners were flown over so-called “gay pride” parades and other events that were designed to celebrate sexual sin in several major cities, including Atlanta, Charlotte, Los Angeles, Orlando, Sandusky (OH) and San Francisco.

Senators from 8 States Betray Voters on One-Man, One-Woman Marriage

On June 12, 2006, in Hawaii, Louisiana, Michigan, Montana, MPA, National, Nebraska, Nevada, Oregon, by Family Policy Network

Since 1998, voters in 20 states have passed state constitutional amendments defining marriage as the exclusive union between one man and one woman. On June 7, 2006, U.S. Senators from 8 of those 20 states failed to support the federal Marriage Protection Amendment (MPA). Voters in Hawaii, Louisiana, Michigan, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, North Dakota and Oregon may wonder why.

Federal Court Rejects “Separation of Church and State”

On December 22, 2005, in Kentucky, Michigan, National, Ohio, Tennessee, by Family Policy Network

The decision is binding in Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky and Tennessee

In an astounding return to judicial interpretation of the actual text of the United States Constitution, a unanimous panel of the 6th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals has issued an historic decision declaring that “the First Amendment does not demand a wall of separation between church and state.” In upholding a Kentucky county’s right to display the Ten Commandments, the panel called the American Civil Liberties Union’s repeated claims to the contrary “extra-constitutional” and “tiresome.”