<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Family Policy Network &#187; California</title>
	<atom:link href="http://familypolicy.net/ca/ca/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://familypolicy.net</link>
	<description>Informing Christians and confronting the culture on the important moral issues of the day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:27:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/2.0.4" -->
	<itunes:summary>Informing Christians and confronting the culture on the important moral issues of the day</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>Family Policy Network, Inc.</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://familypolicy.net/mediafiles/powerpress/fpn-favicon-577.jpg" />
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>Family Policy Network, Inc.</itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>itunes@familypolicy.net</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<managingEditor>itunes@familypolicy.net (Family Policy Network, Inc.)</managingEditor>
	<copyright>2011, Family Policy Network, Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
	<itunes:subtitle>Informing Christians and confronting the culture on the important moral issues of the day</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:keywords>Christian, family, Bible, conservative, prolife, values</itunes:keywords>
	
	<itunes:category text="Religion &amp; Spirituality">
		<itunes:category text="Christianity" />
	</itunes:category>
		<rawvoice:rating>TV-MA</rawvoice:rating>
		<rawvoice:location>Forest, VA</rawvoice:location>
		<rawvoice:frequency>Each Weekday</rawvoice:frequency>
		<item>
		<title>California Bill Would Require Schools to Portray Sexual Sin in &#8220;Positive Light&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://familypolicy.net/us/?p=6803</link>
		<comments>http://familypolicy.net/us/?p=6803#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 05:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Mason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[_Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biblical Sexual Morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[God and Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hope for Homosexuals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familypolicy.net/?p=6803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new bill proposed by an openly-homosexual California state senator would require any state textbooks to add sections on figures and events in homosexual history and portray them in &#8220;a positive light.&#8221; Chalk up the effort as the latest in the long-running efforts of homosexual activists to indoctrinate today&#8217;s children (who will be tomorrow&#8217;s voters) [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://familypolicy.net/us/?p=6803/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Read What Californians Are Saying About Universal, Tax-Payer Funded Abortion in Health Care &#8220;Reform&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://familypolicy.net/ca/?p=2574</link>
		<comments>http://familypolicy.net/ca/?p=2574#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Family Policy Network</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Human Life]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familypolicy.net/?p=2574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Residents across the state of California are voicing their opposition to a congressional proposal that would use taxpayer money to pay for all abortions under the guise of so-called health care "reform".  Pro-family Californians are signing Family Policy Network's petition urging both houses of Congress and President Obama to reject health care "reform" that provides universal abortion funding on the backs of American taxpayers.

Many Californians who signed the petition opposing taxpayer-funded abortion added their own comments to the petition. Here is a sampling of those comments:]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://familypolicy.net/ca/?p=2574/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Declining, Liberal Churches Oppose Biblical Definition of Marriage</title>
		<link>http://familypolicy.net/ca/?p=109</link>
		<comments>http://familypolicy.net/ca/?p=109#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 14:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Family Policy Network</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biblical Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familypolicy.net/tn/?p=109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A group of liberal churches are petitioning the California Supreme Court to overturn the recently voter-approved Proposition 8, which defines marriage as the union of man and woman. The referendum overturns a California Supreme Court decision that temporarily mandated same-sex unions. An official from the Institute on Religion and Democracy points to declining membership in these congregations by saying they "increasingly represent an elite and effete minority." He adds, "Their emptying pews prevent almost any kind of significance."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://familypolicy.net/ca/?p=109/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Tolerant and Diverse&#8221; Homosexuals Attack Grandmother, Stomp Cross</title>
		<link>http://familypolicy.net/ca/?p=622</link>
		<comments>http://familypolicy.net/ca/?p=622#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Family Policy Network</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tolerance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familypolicy.net/?p=622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shocking video reveals hatred and rage from homosexuals protesting the voters' decision to make California the 30th state in the nation to enshrine traditional marriage into their state constitution. In the video, homosexual activists surround an older lady who wants to defend the Biblical definition of marriage. They then strip a cross out of her hands and stomp it on the ground and chant "go home" and "shame on you." 

A television news crew captured the footage. Subsequently, homosexuals shouted down an attempt by the crew to interview the woman.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://familypolicy.net/ca/?p=622/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Schwarzenegger Violates Oath By Opposing Proposition 8 After Election</title>
		<link>http://familypolicy.net/ca/?p=1486</link>
		<comments>http://familypolicy.net/ca/?p=1486#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 06:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Mason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biblical Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biblical Sexual Morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[God and Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homosexual "Marriage"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homosexuality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familypolicy.net/?p=1486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On November 4th, 2008, nearly six million California citizens rejected radical homosexual activism by writing the Biblical definition of marriage into their state&#8217;s constitution. They did so by supporting a ballot refferendum known as &#8220;Proposition 8,&#8221; which passed on the same day Barak Obama was elected president. Before the election, California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger publicly [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://familypolicy.net/ca/?p=1486/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Read What Californians Are Saying to Hallmark About Their &#8220;same-sex couple&#8221; Cards</title>
		<link>http://familypolicy.net/ca/?p=599</link>
		<comments>http://familypolicy.net/ca/?p=599#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 07:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Family Policy Network</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tolerance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familypolicy.net/?p=599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many Californians are joining a nationwide call to boycott Hallmark greeting cards, in response to that company's introduction of so-called "same-sex couple" cards.  The boycott, which was announced in August by <a href="http://familypolicy.net/">Family Policy Network</a>, has begun to attract supporters in cities and towns throughout the nation.

Many Californians who signed the petition to boycott Hallmark over its pro-homosexual cards added their own comments to the statement above. Here is a sampling of those comments:

<ul><li>Madonna in Shasta Lake, CA writes, <em><strong>"We're supposed to love the sinner and hate the sin...loving them isn't condoning their sinful choice."</em></strong></li><br/>

<li>Lucretia in Rancho Santa Margarita, CA writes, <em><strong>"I will no longer, ever, buy another Hallmark product, under any name, unless you pull these cards."</em></strong></li><br/>

<li>Brenda in Olivehurst, CA writes, <em><strong>"Not only I, but my entire family no longer buy cards and gift from your company, and we will not as long as you promote homosexuality."</em></strong></li></ul><br/>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://familypolicy.net/ca/?p=599/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CA Christians Called to Oppose Ballot Measure that Would Decriminalize Prostitution</title>
		<link>http://familypolicy.net/ca/?p=972</link>
		<comments>http://familypolicy.net/ca/?p=972#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 22:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Family Policy Network</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familypolicy.net/?p=972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Opposition is growing to a proposal on San Francisco's November ballot that would, in effect, decriminalize prostitution. The proposal, Proposition K, would halt use of funds to enforce laws against prostitution, including the state ban.

Tony Nassif of Cedars Cultural and Educational Foundation understands how the issue ended up on the ballot. "We have a sexualization of society where standards of right and wrong are disintegrating, and moral paradigms are disintegrating as well," Nassif contends.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://familypolicy.net/ca/?p=972/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Calif. Court: Christian Doctors May Not Refuse to Artificially Inseminate Homosexuals</title>
		<link>http://familypolicy.net/ca/?p=774</link>
		<comments>http://familypolicy.net/ca/?p=774#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 22:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Family Policy Network</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familypolicy.net/?p=774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The same California Supreme Court that created a "right" to homosexual "marriage" earlier this year has now ruled that the state may force healthcare professionals to provide services that support an immoral and physically dangerous lifestyle. 

California's highest court was unanimous in its decision on Monday that Christian doctors may not refuse to perform artificial insemination for homosexual patients.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://familypolicy.net/ca/?p=774/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Library Employee Fired For Reporting Patron&#8217;s Use Of Child Pornography</title>
		<link>http://familypolicy.net/ca/?p=730</link>
		<comments>http://familypolicy.net/ca/?p=730#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 07:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Family Policy Network</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familypolicy.net/ca/?p=730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On February 28, while working at the Lindsay Branch Library, Brenda Biesterfeld, a Librarian Assistant, reported to police that a library patron was viewing child pornography on one of the public-use computers in the library. Two days later and without explanation, Biesterfeld was terminated.

The firing of Biesterfeld has outraged the Lindsay community and has raised concerns over how the Library responds to the viewing of illegal child pornography on library property]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://familypolicy.net/ca/?p=730/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California Bill Would Disincentivize Marriage</title>
		<link>http://familypolicy.net/ca/?p=727</link>
		<comments>http://familypolicy.net/ca/?p=727#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 07:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Family Policy Network</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familypolicy.net/ca/?p=727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A bill ensuring that unwed parents remain unmarried is receiving strong opposition from a leading California-based pro-family organization. Campaign for Children and Families (CCF) President Randy Thomasson criticized the proposal by saying, "SB 1066 rewards unwed parents for not getting married."  He added, "This foolish bill promotes cohabitation just as government welfare programs subsidized illegitimacy. SB 1066 ensures that unwed parents remain uncommitted. Why get married if you can get the legal rights and benefits of marriage without saying 'I do?' And what about the kids, who research shows do much worse in unmarried environments? SB 1066 is bad public policy. Itâ€™s blind to the evidence that marriage is 1000 percent more stable than shacking up."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://familypolicy.net/ca/?p=727/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Database Caching 1/66 queries in 0.061 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 904/1025 objects using disk: basic

Served from: familypolicy.net @ 2012-02-04 03:16:37 -->
